Work seamlessly with your team
Microsoft's collaboration platform. Trustpilot: 1.2/5 from 405 reviews (88% 1-star). Users report high RAM usage, bugs, performance issues, and inferior experience compared to Skype. Part of Microsoft 365, integrates with SharePoint and OneDrive.
Patterns extracted from real user feedback — not raw reviews.
Teams consistently uses 1GB+ RAM even when idle, spiking higher during meetings. Microsoft admitted in November 2025 that Teams 'eats RAM on Windows doing nothing.' Users report system slowdowns, freezes, and lag. A fix is promised for January-February 2026 but core architecture issues persist.
Enterprise customers must now buy Teams separately ($5.25/user/month) from M365 due to antitrust pressure. Forrester called it 'just a sneaky price hike.' E3 licenses went up 95% and E5 up 70% in two years when including Teams. What was 'free' now costs extra.
Beyond base pricing: Teams Premium costs $10/user/month for advanced meeting features, Copilot costs $30/user/month for AI, and Teams Phone with calling is $20+/user/month. These 'optional' features are increasingly necessary, dramatically increasing true costs.
In 2025, Microsoft started charging for group calls longer than 60 minutes on the free plan. What was previously unlimited is now time-restricted, pushing free users toward paid tiers - similar to Zoom's 40-minute strategy.
Users miss messages due to notification failures - getting some but not others, mobile notifications suppressed incorrectly, or no alerts at all. Reddit and Microsoft Community forums have extensive threads about missed messages causing work delays and frustration.
Finding files in Teams is painful because it's built on SharePoint. Documents get lost in channels, shared pictures require endless scrolling to find, and the file structure is confusing. Users report spending significant time hunting for previously shared content.
Trustpilot and G2 reviews consistently describe Teams as having an 'unintuitive and overcomplicated' interface. Features are buried, navigation is confusing, and the app tries to do too much. Non-technical users particularly struggle with the learning curve.
Users forced to migrate from Skype for Business to Teams report difficulties: contacts not syncing automatically, lost Skype credits, and having to relearn a completely different interface. The transition was not smooth for many organizations.
Mac users face disproportionate issues: video calls not working, 100%+ CPU usage, sign-in failures after macOS updates, and features lagging behind Windows. The new Teams requires macOS 13+ and leaves older Macs unsupported. Apple Silicon compatibility has been problematic.
Users report frequent sync problems: calendar discrepancies between Teams and Outlook, files not syncing to OneDrive, and notification inconsistencies creating a disjointed experience. The integration that should be seamless often breaks.
Seamless Microsoft 365 integration
Teams integrates deeply with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, SharePoint, and OneDrive. You can edit Office documents directly in Teams without switching apps. For organizations already using M365, this integration is genuinely valuable.
Included with Microsoft 365 subscriptions
For Business Basic ($6/user) and above, Teams is included at no extra cost. Organizations already paying for Microsoft 365 get Teams 'free,' making it hard to justify paying for Slack or Zoom on top.
Strong video conferencing for large meetings
Teams supports up to 300 participants in group video calls on paid plans, with features like Together Mode, breakout rooms, and live captions. For large all-hands meetings and webinars, Teams is capable.
Enterprise-grade security and compliance
Teams offers strong security features: end-to-end encryption for 1:1 calls, compliance certifications (HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001), data loss prevention, and eDiscovery. For regulated industries, Teams' security posture is a significant advantage.
All-in-one workspace reduces tool fragmentation
Chat, video, files, calendar, and apps in one place reduces switching between tools. For organizations wanting to consolidate their tech stack, Teams provides a unified workspace - even if individual features aren't best-in-class.
Users: Unlimited users
Storage: 5GB per user
Limitations: 60-minute group call limit, No phone system, No admin tools, 5GB storage cap
Users: Up to 300 users
Storage: 10GB per user
Limitations: No Office apps, No business email, No SharePoint
Users: Up to 300 users
Storage: 1TB per user
Limitations: No desktop Office apps, No advanced security, Copilot $30/user extra
Users: Up to 300 users
Storage: 1TB per user
Limitations: 300 webinar limit, No advanced security features
Users: Up to 300 users
Storage: 1TB per user
Limitations: Phone system not included, Limited to 300 users
Users: Unlimited
Storage: Varies by M365 plan
Limitations: Not standalone - requires Enterprise M365 license
Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365
If you're already paying for M365 Business Basic or above, Teams is included. The deep integration with Office apps, SharePoint, and OneDrive creates genuine workflow advantages. The switching cost to alternatives rarely justifies the disruption.
Enterprises needing compliance and security
Teams offers strong compliance features: HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, data retention policies, eDiscovery, and DLP. For regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), Teams' enterprise security may be required.
Windows-centric organizations
Teams works best on Windows with proper notifications, stable performance, and full feature access. If your organization is Windows-based with M365, Teams is the natural choice despite its flaws.
Microsoft 365 organizations
Included with M365 - no extra cost. Deep SharePoint, Office, and Outlook integration. Logical choice if already paying for Microsoft.
Engineering teams
Works but not developer-focused. Slack has more dev integrations. Teams mainly makes sense if organization already committed to Microsoft 365.
Creative agencies
Less third-party integrations than Slack. Creative tools often integrate better with Slack. But Teams works if budget is tight.
Mac-primary organizations
Teams on Mac has persistent issues: video failures, extreme CPU usage (100%+), sign-in problems after macOS updates, and feature parity lags behind Windows. If your team is Mac-heavy, expect frustration. Slack works better across platforms.
Users needing lightweight, fast collaboration
Teams is resource-heavy (1GB+ RAM idle) and can slow down even modern machines. If you need quick, responsive chat without system drag, Slack's desktop app is significantly lighter and faster.
Organizations wanting best-in-class chat
Slack's chat experience - search, threading, integrations - is superior to Teams. If messaging is your primary need and you're not already deep in Microsoft 365, Slack remains the better pure chat solution.
Small businesses not using Office apps
Teams' value comes from M365 integration. Without Word, Excel, Outlook, and SharePoint, you're paying for features you won't use. Google Workspace with Meet or Slack would be more appropriate.
Common buyer's remorse scenarios reported by users.
Enterprise organizations budgeted for M365 E3/E5 thinking Teams was included, then discovered they now need to pay $5.25/user/month extra. The retroactive price increase caught many off guard, especially those with annual contracts.
Teams seemed fine for small usage but as more employees joined and channels multiplied, the app became sluggish. RAM usage ballooned, meetings lagged, and productivity suffered. By then, the organization was too committed to switch.
Organizations with mixed Windows/Mac environments deployed Teams expecting cross-platform consistency. Mac users encountered persistent issues - video problems, CPU spikes, feature delays - creating frustration and productivity gaps.
Teams switching from Slack find Teams' chat inferior: worse search, clunkier threading, fewer integrations. The 'all-in-one' promise didn't compensate for losing Slack's focused, polished messaging experience.
Organizations realized Teams Premium ($10/user) for decent meetings, Copilot ($30/user) for AI, and Teams Phone ($20/user) for calling add up quickly. What seemed like a 'free' included tool became expensive.
Scenarios where this product tends to fail users.
Business plans cap at 300 users. Growing organizations must move to Enterprise licensing with separate Teams add-on ($5.25/user) plus E1/E3/E5 base costs. The transition involves licensing complexity and potential cost surprises.
Base Teams seems affordable until you add Teams Premium ($10/user), Copilot ($30/user), and Teams Phone ($20/user). An E3 organization wanting full features could pay $60+/user/month - far from 'included with M365.'
Teams on Mac has persistent issues that Windows users don't face. When a significant portion of the team uses Macs, the constant workarounds, bugs, and feature gaps create friction that degrades productivity.
Teams' RAM usage becomes critical when users have back-to-back meetings or many active chats. Machines slow down, meetings lag, and users start closing Teams between meetings - defeating the always-on chat purpose.
Teams' guest access is more complex than Zoom or Slack. External participants need Microsoft accounts or complex guest invites. For organizations with many external meetings, this friction compounds.
As channels multiply and years of files accumulate in SharePoint, finding anything becomes a nightmare. The search doesn't work well, file locations are confusing, and institutional knowledge gets lost.
Slack
Teams switch for better UX and integrations. Gain: 2,600+ integrations, cleaner interface. Trade-off: expensive per-user, no bundled video.
Discord
Tech startups switch for better voice and free tier. Gain: unlimited history free, great voice. Trade-off: less professional, no enterprise features.
Zoom
Teams for video meetings can be clunky compared to Zoom's polished experience. Organizations needing frequent external meetings prefer Zoom's frictionless guest joining and brand recognition.
Google Workspace (Meet + Chat)
Organizations not committed to Microsoft switch for simpler pricing, browser-based tools, and Google's collaboration ecosystem. Google Meet's no-download joining and real-time doc collaboration appeal to agile teams.
Notion + separate video tool
Teams using Notion for documentation switch to pairing it with a dedicated video tool rather than Teams' all-in-one approach. Better docs + better video beats mediocre-at-both.
Google Chat
Google Workspace users switch to consolidate. Gain: Gmail integration, included. Trade-off: basic features, less adoption.
