# tl;dv Problems & Issues 2026 - Meeting Transcription Troubles

Source: https://www.tryorbye.com/products/tl-dv
Last analyzed: 2026-03-06
Try or Bye score: 52/100

## Verdict: Try with caution

tl;dv works for some teams, but users report recurring problems (score 52/100). Most reported issues: Transcription Accuracy Only 85-90%; Free Tier Severely Limited - 10 AI Summaries Lifetime; Bot Attaches Without Invitation. Not a good fit for: Casual users with few monthly meetings; Teams with fast-paced, overlapping discussions; Technical teams with specialized vocabulary. Users most often switch to Fathom, Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai.

## What it is

tl;dv is an AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes video calls on Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. It auto-generates meeting notes with timestamps and allows clip sharing.

## Common problems

- **Transcription Accuracy Only 85-90%** (performance): Users report tl;dv transcription accuracy hovers around 85-90%, significantly below competitors like HappyScribe that offer 95% accuracy. This means 1 in 10 words may be wrong, requiring manual cleanup for any important meeting. Technical jargon, accents, and fast speech make accuracy worse.
- **Free Tier Severely Limited - 10 AI Summaries Lifetime** (pricing): The free tier only includes 10 AI meeting summaries for the lifetime of the account - not per month, lifetime. After that, users must upgrade or lose the AI summary feature entirely. Recordings on free tier are also deleted after 90 days, making it useless for long-term reference.
- **Bot Attaches Without Invitation** (reliability): Multiple users report the AI note taker bot attached itself to meetings without being invited, and it's impossible to decouple it from calendar invites. Attempts to contact tl;dv support received no response, while the bot continues emailing upgrade payment requests. Extremely frustrating for those trying to control meeting access.
- **AI Summaries Miss Critical Nuances** (usability): AI-generated summaries regularly miss context and nuances from meetings. Users report having to prompt the AI multiple times to capture all action items correctly. The output should be treated as a 'smart first draft that needs review' rather than something you can trust blindly.
- **Speaker Identification Fails with Overlapping Speech** (performance): Speaker identification works great for one-on-one calls or structured meetings where people take turns, but falls apart when multiple people talk quickly, interrupt, or overlap. Fast-paced team discussions require extensive manual cleanup to correctly attribute statements.
- **Buggy Recordings and Processing Delays** (reliability): Users report buggy recordings that fail to process or take hours to complete. The help center has a dedicated article for 'My video/transcript is still processing' - indicating this is a known widespread issue. For time-sensitive meetings, this delay makes the tool unreliable.
- **Paid Plans Don't Allow Full Transcript Export** (pricing): Despite feature lists promising unlimited transcript downloads, paid plans don't actually allow full transcript export or download. Users report customer service refusing refunds even when the product can't deliver its advertised features. Classic bait-and-switch complaint.
- **No Refunds Even When Features Don't Work** (support): Customer service refuses refunds even when the product demonstrably doesn't deliver promised features. Users who paid for export capabilities that don't work report being stuck with subscriptions. Support responsiveness is also criticized, with some reports of no response at all.
- **Video Library Organization Is a Mess** (usability): The video library for managing recordings is described as 'a mess' by users. Finding specific recordings becomes increasingly difficult as the library grows. Poor organization and lack of robust tagging or folder systems make long-term use frustrating.
- **Pro Plan Expensive vs Competition** (pricing): Pro at $29/month is expensive compared to alternatives. Fireflies offers similar multi-meeting insights at $18/month, Otter at $16.99/month, and both MeetGeek and Avoma start at $19/month. Users paying premium prices expect premium accuracy, which tl;dv doesn't deliver.
- **Search Functionality Unreliable** (usability): Search works for straightforward keyword matches but sometimes returns meetings that don't actually contain the searched keywords. Users looking for specific moments in past meetings waste time scrolling through irrelevant results. Critical for teams relying on meeting archives.
- **Cannot Add Custom Terminology** (usability): Users cannot add custom terms, product names, or industry jargon to improve transcription accuracy. If your business uses specialized vocabulary, expect constant transcription errors. This is a major limitation for technical teams, medical professionals, or anyone with domain-specific language.
- **Limited Free-Tier Integrations** (integrations): Free tier users face severely limited integrations and export options. CRM integrations like Salesforce and HubSpot are locked behind paid plans. For teams wanting to try before they buy, the free tier doesn't represent the real product experience.

## What users like

- **Easy Setup and Clean Interface**: Getting started with tl;dv is quick - install extension, connect calendar, and it auto-joins meetings. The interface is modern and intuitive, making basic transcription accessible even for non-technical users.
- **Supports Major Video Platforms**: Works seamlessly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. No need for multiple tools across different platforms. Calendar integration means meetings are recorded automatically.
- **Timestamped Clips and Highlights**: The ability to create timestamped clips and highlights from meetings is genuinely useful. Team members can share specific moments rather than making colleagues watch entire recordings.
- **Fast Transcription Processing**: When it works, transcripts are ready within minutes of meeting completion. For short meetings under an hour, processing is typically quick compared to some competitors.
- **Multi-Language Support**: Supports transcription in 30+ languages, making it useful for international teams. Language detection is automatic, though accuracy varies by language.
- **CRM and Productivity Integrations**: Paid plans include integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Notion, and Slack. Meeting notes can flow directly into CRM records for sales teams tracking customer conversations.

## Pricing

- **Free**: $0.00 (free) — hidden costs: Only 10 AI summaries total (not monthly), recordings deleted after 90 days, limited integrations, no CRM access
- **Pro**: $18.00 (yearly) — hidden costs: Billed annually at $216/year. Monthly option is $29/month - 60% more expensive. Per-user pricing adds up for teams.
- **Business**: $59.00 (yearly) — hidden costs: Billed annually at $708/user/year. For a team of 5, that's $3,540/year. Enterprise SSO requires contacting sales.
- **Enterprise**: $0.00 (usage_based) — hidden costs: Requires annual contract, pricing not transparent - must contact sales

## Who should and shouldn't use it

- **Casual users with few monthly meetings** — Avoid: The free tier's 10 lifetime AI summaries will be exhausted quickly. If you have more than 2-3 meetings per month that need summarization, you'll hit the limit within weeks and face an upgrade wall.
- **Teams with fast-paced, overlapping discussions** — Avoid: Speaker identification breaks down completely when people talk over each other or interrupt frequently. Expect to spend significant time manually fixing attribution in transcripts.
- **Technical teams with specialized vocabulary** — Avoid: No ability to add custom terminology means constant transcription errors for product names, technical terms, and industry jargon. Every transcript will need manual correction.
- **Sales teams tracking customer calls** — Good fit: CRM integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot work well for automatically logging call notes. Clip sharing helps highlight key customer moments for team training.
- **Remote teams across time zones** — Depends: Recorded meetings help async teams catch up, and multi-language support is useful. However, transcription accuracy issues mean important details may be missed or wrong.
- **Privacy-conscious organizations** — Avoid: The bot automatically attaches to calendar events, sometimes without clear invitation. Users report difficulty removing it from meeting access. Consider bot-free alternatives like Bluedot.
- **Solo consultants and coaches** — Depends: Clip sharing and timestamped highlights are useful for client recaps. However, the $18-29/month cost adds up when cheaper alternatives exist with comparable features.
- **Enterprise teams needing compliance** — Depends: Enterprise tier offers SSO and custom retention, but pricing requires sales contact. Accuracy issues may be problematic for regulated industries where transcription errors matter.

## Alternatives

- **Fathom** (https://www.tryorbye.com/products/fathom): Best free alternative with unlimited recordings and AI summaries at no cost. Users switch for the genuinely free tier - no 10-summary lifetime limit like tl;dv. Trade-off: less robust team features and CRM integrations.
- **Fireflies.ai** (https://www.tryorbye.com/products/fireflies-ai): Teams switch for multi-meeting intelligence at $18/month vs tl;dv's $29. Acts as a searchable knowledge base across all meetings. Trade-off: Similar accuracy issues, BIPA lawsuit concerns for privacy.
- **Otter.ai** (https://www.tryorbye.com/products/otter-ai): Real-time transcription during meetings at $16.99/month. Better for live note-taking and collaboration. Trade-off: Own privacy controversies (2025 class action), limited video recording.
- **Grain** (https://www.tryorbye.com/products/grain): Superior video clip sharing and highlight reels for sales and customer success teams. Better library organization than tl;dv's 'mess.' Trade-off: Higher pricing, focused more on clips than transcription.
- **Bluedot**: Privacy-conscious users switch for bot-free recording - no visible bot in meetings. Works for in-person meetings too. Trade-off: Newer product, fewer integrations.
- **MeetGeek**: Comparable features at $19/month with better reviews for transcription accuracy. Good for teams wanting tl;dv-like features without the bugs. Trade-off: Smaller user base, less brand recognition.

## FAQ

### Is tl;dv free really free?

Technically yes, but severely limited. The free tier includes unlimited meeting recordings but only 10 AI summaries for the lifetime of your account - not monthly, lifetime. After exhausting those 10 summaries, you lose AI features entirely. Additionally, free recordings are deleted after 90 days, making long-term archival impossible without upgrading.

### Is tl;dv worth the price?

At $18-29/month per user, tl;dv is on the expensive end for meeting transcription. Competitors like Otter.ai ($16.99), Fireflies ($18), and MeetGeek ($19) offer similar features at lower prices. Given reported issues with transcription accuracy (85-90% vs 95% elsewhere) and export limitations, the value proposition is questionable unless you specifically need their CRM integrations.

### How accurate is tl;dv transcription?

Users report 85-90% accuracy, which means roughly 1 in 10 words may be incorrect. Competitors like HappyScribe claim 95% accuracy. Accuracy drops further with overlapping speakers, accents, technical jargon, or fast speech. You cannot add custom vocabulary to improve accuracy for your specific domain.

### Why does tl;dv bot join meetings without permission?

A common complaint is that the tl;dv bot attaches itself to calendar events automatically and users struggle to remove it. Once connected to your calendar, it may join meetings you didn't explicitly want recorded. Some users report being unable to decouple it even after multiple attempts. Check your calendar integration settings carefully.

### What is the best tl;dv alternative?

Fathom is the best free alternative with unlimited AI summaries at no cost. For paid options, Fireflies.ai ($18/month) offers multi-meeting intelligence, while Otter.ai ($16.99/month) excels at real-time transcription. Bluedot is best for privacy-conscious users as it works without a visible bot in meetings.

### Can I export transcripts from tl;dv?

This is a common pain point. Despite marketing suggesting unlimited transcript downloads, users report paid plans don't actually allow full transcript export. Customer service has reportedly refused refunds when users discovered this limitation after subscribing. Test export features thoroughly before committing to an annual plan.

### Does tl;dv work with multiple speakers?

Yes, but with caveats. Speaker identification works well for structured meetings where people take turns speaking. It breaks down significantly when multiple people talk quickly, interrupt each other, or have overlapping conversations. Fast-paced team discussions require manual cleanup to correctly attribute statements.

### How long does tl;dv store recordings?

Free tier recordings are automatically deleted after 90 days - no exceptions. Pro and Business plans offer unlimited retention. If you need long-term archives without paying, you'll need to manually export recordings before the 90-day window or upgrade to a paid plan.

### Why is tl;dv search not finding my meetings?

Users report the search functionality is 'hit or miss.' While it works for straightforward keyword matches, it sometimes returns meetings that don't actually contain the searched keywords, or misses meetings that definitely do. The inconsistency becomes frustrating as your meeting library grows.

### Is tl;dv better than Otter.ai?

Depends on your priorities. tl;dv has better video platform support (Zoom, Meet, Teams) and clip sharing. Otter.ai has superior real-time transcription during meetings and is cheaper at $16.99/month. Both have accuracy issues and privacy controversies. Otter.ai faced a 2025 class-action lawsuit, while tl;dv has bot invasion complaints.

### Can tl;dv add custom vocabulary?

No. tl;dv does not allow users to add custom terms, product names, or industry jargon to improve transcription accuracy. This is a significant limitation for technical teams, medical professionals, legal firms, or anyone using specialized vocabulary that standard speech recognition doesn't handle well.

### Does tl;dv offer refunds?

Users report difficulty getting refunds, even when the product doesn't deliver advertised features. Multiple complaints mention customer service refusing refunds for paid plans that didn't allow transcript exports as promised. Review the terms carefully and test thoroughly during any trial period.

---
Try or Bye aggregates problem patterns from user reviews, forums, and app stores. Methodology: https://www.tryorbye.com/methodology