Try or ByeTry or Bye
ProductsCategoriesTop PicksCompareBudget CalcContact
Try or ByeTry or Bye

Where digital products disappoint — based on real user feedback patterns.

© 2026 Try or Bye. All rights reserved.

Explore

  • All Products
  • Categories
  • Compare

Insights

  • Signals
  • Problems
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. CockroachDB vs Supabase

CockroachDBvsSupabase

Saas65
vs
Developer Tool
ScoresSignalsPricingFeatures

Score Comparison

65
Overall
62
60
Pricing
55
55
Usability
70
70
Performance
60
65
Support
45
85
Reliability
55
45
Onboarding
80
–
Mobile
65
80
Security
75
65
Integrations
70
CockroachDBSupabase

Signals Comparison

Onboarding

CockroachDB

  • Steep learning curve for configuration and optimization(7/10)

Supabase

  • Inconsistent documentation frustrates developers(5/10)
Customization

CockroachDB

  • Not 100% PostgreSQL compatible - migration requires effort(7/10)
  • Vendor lock-in with Enterprise-specific features(7/10)

Supabase

No signals

Performance

CockroachDB

  • Resource intensive - high CPU, memory, and storage consumption(7/10)
  • Not suitable for analytics or OLAP workloads(6/10)
  • Single-region performance trails PostgreSQL(6/10)
  • Serverless performance issues reported(7/10)

Supabase

  • Egress costs stack fast - small apps jump from $25 to $100+(8/10)
  • Edge Functions cold starts and execution limits(6/10)
  • Database hits connection limits as user base grows(7/10)
Pricing

CockroachDB

  • License change retired free Core version in 2024(8/10)

Supabase

  • Free projects pause after 7 days of inactivity(9/10)
  • Unexpected billing - charged for ghost compute(9/10)
  • Team plan jumps to $599/month - big leap from $25 Pro(6/10)
Usability

CockroachDB

  • Version upgrades require manual analysis(6/10)

Supabase

  • RLS policies complex and impact performance significantly(7/10)
  • Local development with CLI is unreliable - Docker issues(7/10)
Integrations

CockroachDB

  • Monitoring tools struggle with metadata differences(5/10)

Supabase

  • IPv4 connection requires paid add-on - network limitations(6/10)
Support

CockroachDB

No signals

Supabase

  • No live chat even on Enterprise - support feels outdated(7/10)
Reliability

CockroachDB

No signals

Supabase

  • 691+ outages over 3 years - frequent downtime reported(9/10)
  • Real-time subscription limits cause dropped connections(7/10)
  • Auth errors and email link failures(6/10)

Pricing Comparison

CockroachDB

Enterprise Free
Free

Users: N/A

Storage: Unlimited (self-hosted)

Limits: Revenue threshold ($10M), community support only, requires self-hosting expertise

Infrastructure costs (servers, storage, networking), operational overhead
Basic (Cloud)
Popular
$0/mo

Users: N/A

Storage: 10GB free

Limits: No SLA, basic support, limited cluster customization

Compute: ~$0.20/vCPU-hour. Storage: tiered by region. Data transfer: separate charges
Standard (Cloud)
$0/mo

Users: N/A

Storage: Pay per GB

Limits: Usage-based can be unpredictable, requires cost monitoring

All components unbundled: compute, storage, backups, CDC, data transfer billed separately
Advanced (Cloud)
$0/mo

Users: N/A

Storage: Custom

Limits: Requires sales engagement, custom contracts

Enterprise pricing negotiated per customer, significantly higher than Standard

Supabase

Free
Free

Users: Unlimited users

Storage: 500MB database, 1GB file storage

Limits: Auto-pauses without traffic, No email support, No SSO, No point-in-time recovery, Max 500MB database, Edge functions limited

Projects pause after 7 days inactivity, No production SLA, Limited to 2 projects, Community support only
Pro
Popular
$25/mo

Users: Unlimited users

Storage: 8GB database, 100GB file storage

Limits: No team collaboration features, No SOC 2 compliance, No priority support, No SSO/SAML, 50GB egress then usage-based

$0.125/GB database beyond 8GB, $0.09/GB egress beyond 50GB, $0.021/GB file storage beyond 100GB, Usage-based pricing adds up fast
Team
$599/mo

Users: Unlimited users

Storage: 8GB database, 100GB file storage

Limits: No dedicated support, No custom contracts, No HIPAA (Enterprise only), Same base limits as Pro

Same usage-based pricing as Pro beyond limits, Big jump from $25 Pro, Minimum commitment expected
Enterprise
Free

Users: Unlimited

Storage: Custom

Limits: Requires sales negotiation, Long implementation timeline, Must meet minimum spend

Starts at $15,000/year minimum, Long sales cycle, Complex procurement, Annual commitment required

Feature Comparison

FeatureCockroachDBSupabase
Database
Distributed SQL

Automatic sharding

PostgreSQL Database

Full SQL support, real PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL Compatible

Partial

ACID Transactions

Distributed

Full PostgreSQL Compatibility

Partial only

Database Branching

Not available (Neon has this)

Point-in-time Recovery

Enterprise only

Infrastructure
Multi-Region

Built-in

API
Auto-generated REST API

PostgREST instant APIs

GraphQL API

Via pg_graphql extension

Reliability
Automatic Failover

Zero downtime

Security
Row Level Security

Powerful but impacts performance

SSO/SAML

Team plan ($599) and above

Scaling
Horizontal Scaling

Add nodes

Auth
Authentication

Email, OAuth, magic links

Storage
File Storage

S3-compatible object storage

Deployment
Self-Hosted Option

Enterprise

Self-hosting

Full Docker deployment

Compute
Edge Functions

Deno runtime, 60s limit

Real-time
Real-time Subscriptions

WebSocket-based, has limits

Analytics
OLAP/Analytics

OLTP only

Licensing
Open Source License

Source-available

Compliance
SOC 2 Compliance

Team plan and above

HIPAA Compliance

Enterprise only

Support
Live Chat Support

Not available at any tier

Phone Support

Not available at any tier