GitHub CopilotvsSourcegraph
Score Comparison
Signals Comparison
GitHub Copilot
- Quality declining over time(9/10)
- Responses have become slower(6/10)
Sourcegraph
- Large repositories require iterative prompting(5/10)
GitHub Copilot
- Premium request limits cause cost spikes(8/10)
- Premium tiers expensive for individuals(5/10)
Sourcegraph
- Cody Pro discontinued July 2025(9/10)
- Enterprise pricing very expensive(7/10)
- Pricing based on lines of code in some cases(5/10)
GitHub Copilot
- Context awareness problems in large projects(7/10)
- Agent Mode makes unwanted code changes(7/10)
- Inconsistent suggestion quality(6/10)
- Generic error code harder to debug(6/10)
Sourcegraph
- Occasional hallucinations in AI output(6/10)
- AI struggles with complex multi-step logic(5/10)
- Confusing product transitions (Cody to Amp)(6/10)
- Over-reliance risk for newer developers(4/10)
GitHub Copilot
- Copyright and license concerns unresolved(8/10)
Sourcegraph
No signals
GitHub Copilot
- Poor customer support responsiveness(6/10)
Sourcegraph
- Account bans for minor violations(8/10)
- Individual users deprioritized(5/10)
GitHub Copilot
- Learning curve to use effectively(5/10)
Sourcegraph
- Viewed as 'vitamin' not 'painkiller'(6/10)
GitHub Copilot
- Service stops working after payment(7/10)
Sourcegraph
- Company instability - multiple layoffs(8/10)
Pricing Comparison
GitHub Copilot
Users: Individual
Limits: Limited premium requests, no advanced models, no enterprise features
Users: Individual
Limits: Premium request limits still apply, no organization management, limited model selection
Users: Individual
Limits: Still no organization features, premium requests still limited despite 4x price
Users: Per user
Limits: Requires GitHub Enterprise Cloud for some features, no Copilot Workspace access
Users: Per user
Limits: Expensive at scale, requires enterprise commitment
Sourcegraph
Users: Individual
Limits: DISCONTINUED - migrate to Amp or find alternative
Users: Up to 50 users
Limits: 50 user limit, fewer enterprise features than full Enterprise tier
Users: Unlimited
Limits: Very expensive, pricing may include LOC component, requires sales process
Users: Individual
Limits: New product, unknown long-term pricing, replaces discontinued Cody individual plans
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GitHub Copilot | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Core | ||
| Inline code completions Primary feature, works well for patterns | ||
| Code search across repositories Core strength - industry leading | ||
| Chat interface Ask questions about code | ||
| Code review assistance Enterprise plan | ||
| AI | ||
| AI code completion (Cody) Enterprise only - individual plans discontinued | ||
| Codebase context understanding Good contextual awareness | ||
| PR summaries Useful documentation feature | ||
| Model selection GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, Claude - with quotas | ||
| Custom model training Enterprise plan only | ||
| Agentic workflows (Amp) New product - replaces Cody individual | ||
| Editing | ||
| Multi-file editing Agent Mode - controversial quality | ||
| Context | ||
| Codebase indexing Limited context awareness vs Cursor | ||
| IDE | ||
| VS Code integration Excellent, primary integration | ||
| JetBrains integration Good support | ||
| Neovim integration Available | ||
| Integrations | ||
| VS Code extension Available | ||
| JetBrains extension Available | ||
| Browser extension For code search | ||
| GitHub/GitLab integration Repository connections | ||
| GitHub PR/Issue integration Strong | ||
| Security | ||
| Enterprise SSO Business/Enterprise plans | ||
| Audit logs Enterprise tier | ||
| Deployment | ||
| On-premises deployment Cloud only | ||
| Pricing | ||
| Free tier Discontinued July 2025 | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Offline mode Requires internet | ||