Heroku Problems & Issues
PlatformCloud Application Platform
Heroku pioneered simple PaaS deployments but is now in decline. No free tier (removed 2022), expensive scaling, major 2025 outages, and February 2026 'sustaining mode' announcement signal the platform's trajectory. Best for existing apps not worth migrating; avoid for new projects.
Should you use Heroku?
ByeHeroku disappoints many users (score 48/100). Most reported issues: Free tier eliminated in November 2022; June 10, 2025 outage - 15+ hours of downtime; Costs escalate quickly with scale. Not a good fit for: Hobby developers and students; Startups needing to scale; Teams requiring high reliability. Users most often switch to Back4App, Render, Railway.
Top problems
- Free tier eliminated in November 2022
- June 10, 2025 outage - 15+ hours of downtime
- Costs escalate quickly with scale
Avoid if you are
- Hobby developers and students
- Startups needing to scale
- Teams requiring high reliability
Common alternatives: Back4App, Render, Railway
Overview
Heroku is the pioneering PaaS platform that popularized 'git push' deployments. Owned by Salesforce since 2010, it offers simple app deployment with dynos, managed databases, and add-ons. Once the go-to choice for developers, Heroku eliminated its free tier in 2022 and entered 'sustaining engineering mode' in February 2026.
Signals & Issues
Patterns extracted from real user feedback — not raw reviews.
Heroku permanently removed all free tiers in November 2022, citing 'extraordinary effort managing fraud and abuse.' The lowest option is now Eco dynos at $5/month with sleep after 30 minutes. This killed Heroku for hobby projects, students, and startups that relied on free hosting.
Capterra reviews consistently note costs 'get really expensive really fast.' Basic dynos start at $7/month but Standard-1X is $25/month, and Performance dynos reach $250-500/month. Multiple dynos, databases, and add-ons compound rapidly. Companies outgrowing Heroku face steep bills.
Trustpilot reviews report being charged for months while believing they used the free version, and continuing to be billed even after deleting accounts and projects. Some users were blocked from accounts while monthly charges continued, unable to contact support to remove credit cards.
The cheapest Eco plan ($5/month for 1000 hours) has dynos that sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity. First requests after sleep take 10-30 seconds to wake up. For always-on apps, Basic dynos at $7/month are the minimum, making the $5 'entry point' misleading.
Heroku only accepts credit card billing on a monthly basis. No PayPal, ACH, wire transfers, or annual billing options are available. This limits accessibility for international developers and organizations with different payment requirements.
On June 10, 2025, an automated OS update caused a catastrophic 15-hour, 45-minute outage. A legacy script failed to reapply network routes, severing outbound connectivity for all dynos. Applications were completely inoperable, CLI tools failed, and even the Status Page went down - Heroku couldn't communicate with customers.
In February 2026, Heroku announced transition to 'sustaining engineering model' focused on stability, security, and reliability rather than new features. Enterprise Account contracts are no longer offered to new customers. This signals the platform's decline as a competitive PaaS.
Beyond the 15-hour June 10 outage, Heroku had another 8.5-hour incident on June 18, 2025 affecting dyno formations and autoscaling. The frequency and severity of 2025 outages significantly exceeded previous years, raising serious reliability questions.
During the June 10 outage, Heroku's Status Page and internal tools ran on the same affected infrastructure. When applications failed, the company's ability to respond and communicate was severely impaired. Customers had no reliable source of incident information.
Trustpilot reviews describe customer service as 'comically bad' with users blocked from accounts for extended periods while still being charged. Login issues go unresolved after 'nearly a week' of emails. Support is only available via email with users 'shuttled between departments without solutions.'
Heroku 'abstracts away a lot of supporting infrastructure' reducing developer control. This creates significant vendor lock-in - it's 'really difficult to switch from Heroku.' Modern teams need granular control for specialized solutions and optimization that Heroku's platform doesn't accommodate.
Users report GitHub pushes and deployments sometimes fail with 'Something went wrong' errors that should be investigated. Log tracking has issues that 'could use improvements.' The deployment experience has degraded from Heroku's historically smooth workflow.
What Users Love
Simple 'git push' deployment model
Heroku pioneered the 'git push heroku main' deployment workflow that became industry standard. For developers who just want to deploy code without infrastructure management, this simplicity remains unmatched by raw cloud providers. Great for rapid prototyping.
Extensive add-on marketplace
Heroku's add-on marketplace provides one-click integration with databases, monitoring, logging, email, and hundreds of other services. Add-ons simplify infrastructure setup and are billed through Heroku. Third-party integrations are generally well-maintained.
Managed Postgres and Redis included
Heroku Postgres and Heroku Redis are fully managed database services with automatic backups, easy scaling, and reliable performance. For teams without database administration expertise, these managed services significantly reduce operational burden.
Good for small teams and startups (historically)
Heroku allows small teams to deploy production applications without DevOps expertise. Focus on code rather than infrastructure. For startups racing to market, this speed advantage was historically valuable - though alternatives now offer similar ease.
Salesforce backing provides enterprise credibility
As a Salesforce product, Heroku has enterprise compliance certifications and security standards. For organizations already in the Salesforce ecosystem, Heroku integration provides additional value. Enterprise teams get SOC compliance and audit support.
Review apps for pull request environments
Heroku Review Apps automatically create disposable environments for pull requests, enabling easy testing and review before merge. This CI/CD feature remains valuable for teams wanting ephemeral staging environments tied to their GitHub workflow.
Pricing Plans
Users: N/A
Storage: N/A
Limitations: Sleeping dynos, not suitable for production, no custom domains on some plans
Users: N/A
Storage: N/A
Limitations: No memory scaling, no autoscaling, basic monitoring only
Users: N/A
Storage: N/A
Limitations: Still single-tenant, no dedicated resources
Users: N/A
Storage: N/A
Limitations: Still limited compared to raw cloud VMs at similar prices
Features
Deployment
- Git Push Deployment
Heroku pioneered this
- Container Support
Docker support
Databases
- Managed Postgres
Mini $5/mo
- Managed Redis
$3/mo start
Integrations
- Add-on Marketplace
Extensive options
CI/CD
- Review Apps
Scaling
- Autoscaling
Standard+ only
Pricing
- Free Tier
Removed Nov 2022
Platform
- New Features Development
Sustaining mode Feb 2026
Availability
- Always-On ($5)
Eco dynos sleep
Who Should Use This?
Neutral
Developers wanting simple deployments
Heroku's 'git push' simplicity remains valuable, but alternatives like Render and Railway now offer similar ease at lower prices. The February 2026 'sustaining mode' announcement means the platform won't improve. Consider newer alternatives.
Salesforce ecosystem organizations
Heroku Connect for Salesforce integration remains unique. Enterprise compliance and Salesforce backing provide credibility. However, even Salesforce customers should evaluate whether sustaining mode meets their evolving needs.
Enterprise with compliance needs
Heroku Shield provides SOC, HIPAA, and PCI compliance. Salesforce backing adds enterprise credibility. However, Enterprise Account contracts are no longer offered to new customers as of February 2026. Evaluate carefully.
Existing Heroku customers
If your app works and costs are acceptable, immediate migration isn't urgent. But the 'sustaining mode' announcement means no improvements are coming. Plan a gradual migration to alternatives before technical debt accumulates.
Avoid
Hobby developers and students
With no free tier since November 2022, Heroku is no longer viable for hobby projects. Eco dynos ($5/mo) sleep after 30 minutes. Alternatives like Render, Railway, Fly.io, and Vercel offer free tiers that better serve learning and experimentation.
Startups needing to scale
Costs 'get really expensive really fast' with Performance dynos reaching $250-500/month. The June 2025 outages (15+ hours) demonstrate reliability concerns. 'Sustaining mode' means no new features. Modern alternatives offer better value and trajectory.
Teams requiring high reliability
The June 2025 outages (15-hour and 8.5-hour incidents) exposed serious reliability issues. The Status Page going down during outages meant no communication. For production workloads requiring uptime, consider alternatives with better track records.
Teams needing infrastructure control
Heroku 'abstracts away supporting infrastructure' reducing control. Vendor lock-in makes migration 'really difficult.' Modern teams needing customization, containers, or Kubernetes should consider Render, Fly.io, or direct cloud providers.
Regret Patterns
Common buyer's remorse scenarios reported by users.
Developers with hobby projects on Heroku's free tier suddenly faced $5-7/month per app in November 2022. Side projects, learning experiments, and small tools became cost centers. Many scrambled to migrate to alternatives with free tiers.
Startups chose Heroku for ease of deployment but found costs 'get really expensive really fast.' Performance dynos at $250-500/month plus database and add-on costs created bills far exceeding alternatives. Migration became necessary but expensive.
Companies relying on Heroku for production experienced the 15-hour June 10 outage. Applications went completely down, the Status Page failed, and there was no way to get information. SLAs were violated and customers lost. Trust in the platform evaporated.
Teams planning to build on Heroku long-term learned in February 2026 that no new features are coming. The platform they invested in entered maintenance mode. Migration planning began as alternatives continued advancing.
Teams discovered switching from Heroku is 'really difficult.' Buildpacks, Heroku-specific add-ons, and Connect integrations don't port easily. The abstraction that made deployment easy created dependencies that complicated exit.
Users who deleted accounts and projects discovered charges continued. Some were locked out of accounts while monthly billing persisted. Unable to contact support to remove credit cards, they disputed charges through banks.
When It Breaks Down
Scenarios where this product tends to fail users.
Heroku's simplicity becomes a liability as scaling needs grow. Performance dynos cost $250-500/month, databases add more, and bills accumulate faster than on alternatives. The abstraction layer prevents optimization. Migration becomes necessary but difficult.
The June 2025 outages showed Heroku's reliability issues: 15+ hours of complete unavailability, Status Page down, no communication possible. For production apps with uptime requirements, this level of unreliability is unacceptable.
The February 2026 'sustaining mode' announcement means Heroku won't add new features. Teams needing capabilities that competitors have (better Kubernetes support, edge deployment, improved CI/CD) must migrate rather than wait.
Without a free tier, even small projects cost $5/month (with sleep) or $7/month (always-on). Eco dyno sleep creates 10-30 second delays after 30 minutes of inactivity. For side projects and learning, alternatives with free tiers are better choices.
When billing issues or account lockouts occur, Heroku's email-only support is 'comically bad.' Users report being 'shuttled between departments without solutions' for weeks. Credit cards remain on file while accounts stay locked.
Heroku's abstraction prevents granular infrastructure control. Teams needing specific configurations, custom networking, or container flexibility find themselves constrained. The vendor lock-in makes migration to more flexible platforms difficult.
Alternatives Users Switch To
Render
9x mentionedMost popular Heroku alternative. Teams switch for free tier (Render has one, Heroku doesn't), similar simplicity, and active development. Gain: free static sites, preview environments, managed databases included. Trade-off: fewer add-ons, smaller ecosystem.
Railway
8x mentionedDevelopers switch for modern DX and free tier. Gain: usage-based pricing, fast deployments, monorepo support, active feature development. Trade-off: newer platform, smaller community, some features still maturing.
Fly.io
7x mentionedTeams switch for global edge deployment. Gain: deploy close to users worldwide, Docker-native, generous free tier. Trade-off: steeper learning curve, Postgres has had issues, smaller support team.
DigitalOcean
6x mentionedTeams switch for buildpack compatibility and pricing. Gain: familiar workflow, managed databases, predictable costs, strong documentation. Trade-off: less polished than Heroku, fewer add-on integrations.
Vercel
6x mentionedFrontend teams switch for Next.js/React optimization. Gain: zero-config frontend deployment, excellent DX, generous free tier for static sites. Trade-off: limited backend support, expensive at scale.
Back4App
4x mentionedTeams switch for backend-as-a-service with predictable pricing. Gain: Parse-compatible, AI agent support, free tier available. Trade-off: different paradigm from PaaS, less flexibility for custom backends.
Frequently Asked Questions
See how Heroku compares in our Best Cloud Hosting Software rankings, or calculate costs with our Budget Calculator.
Work at Heroku or spotted something outdated? Suggest a correction — we verify every change against public sources. See our methodology.