Midjourney

Midjourney Problems & Issues

Saas

An independent research lab exploring new mediums of thought

Pricing
35
Usability
55
Performance
75
Support
20
Reliability
65
Onboarding
60
Mobile
60
Security
50
Integrations
30

Exceptional artistic quality (75 performance) but severely hampered by poor support (20), pricing concerns (35), and weak integrations (30). Trustpilot 1.6/5 rating reflects billing/support issues. Discord-first approach limits usability despite new web apps.

Overview

Midjourney is an AI-powered image generation tool that creates images from text prompts. It's known for producing artistic, painterly aesthetics and high-quality concept art, though it operates primarily through Discord with a newer web interface.

15 signals analyzed
960 sources reviewed
Last analyzed: Mar 2026
Company Info
Company:Midjourney, Inc.
Founded:2021
HQ:San Francisco, California
Employees:11-50

Signals & Issues

Patterns extracted from real user feedback — not raw reviews.

Support2 signals
Arbitrary account bans with no explanation or recourse

Users report having their paid accounts suspended without clear reasons, warning, or way to appeal. The platform provides no direct communication channel and users find it nearly impossible to get their accounts reinstated. Multiple Trustpilot reviews describe being banned mid-subscription with no refund offered.

Impact: 9/10Reported 8xNegativevia Trustpilot (45 sources)support breakdown
No real customer support - just Discord and docs

Support is handled through Discord channels and online docs, with no live chat, phone number, or real ticketing system. Reviewers describe support as unresponsive with automated replies. When issues arise with billing or bans, users have no effective way to reach a human.

Impact: 8/10Reported 7xNegativevia Trustpilot (55 sources)support breakdown
Pricing3 signals
No refunds policy enforced strictly

Midjourney takes money, delivers defective service, and refuses refunds because 'the amount is too small to fight.' Users who get banned or cancel early report being unable to get any portion of their subscription refunded. Trustpilot rating sits at 1.6/5 stars largely due to billing complaints.

Impact: 8/10Reported 8xNegativevia Trustpilot (60 sources)hidden costs
Stealth Mode privacy costs extra on expensive plans

Your prompts and images are visible to other users in Discord by default. To keep work private, you must pay for Pro ($60/mo) or Mega ($120/mo) plans that include Stealth Mode. Basic and Standard users have no privacy option regardless of the nature of their work.

Impact: 5/10Reported 5xNegativevia Other (40 sources)hidden costs
Mandatory expensive plan for companies over $1M revenue

Companies making more than $1,000,000 USD in gross revenue per year must purchase Pro ($60/mo) or Mega ($120/mo) plans. This mandatory upsell catches businesses off guard when they scale and realize their Standard plan is no longer compliant.

Impact: 5/10Reported 4xNegativevia Other (25 sources)hidden costs
Usability6 signals
Discord-only interface frustrates professionals

Despite launching a web app in 2025, most features still route through Discord's 'hacky-ass interface' as Hacker News users describe it. Professional users find the Discord workflow unprofessional and difficult to integrate into real production workflows. Prompts and images are public unless you pay extra for Stealth Mode.

Impact: 7/10Reported 7xNegativevia Reddit (120 sources)workflow failure
Prompt interpretation is creative, not literal

Midjourney doesn't accurately follow detailed prompts, especially when trying to achieve very specific outcomes. The system interprets prompts creatively rather than literally, which frustrates users who need precise results. Comic artists report getting 3-4 consistent character shots before the AI starts drifting.

Impact: 7/10Reported 7xNegativevia G2 (95 sources)expectation mismatch
Text rendering is still terrible

Midjourney struggles with text generation - text in images doesn't achieve the same level of three-dimensionality as competitors like DALL-E 3. For projects requiring signage, product labels, posters, or any typography, DALL-E remains the default choice over Midjourney.

Impact: 7/10Reported 7xNegativevia G2 (80 sources)workflow failure
Overly sensitive content filter blocks innocent prompts

The prompt filter is described as overly sensitive and difficult to navigate. Terms like 'woman' or certain poses can trigger filters unpredictably, causing constant errors and blocking legitimate creative work. Users find the censorship rules inconsistent and frustrating.

Impact: 6/10Reported 6xNegativevia Reddit (70 sources)expectation mismatch
No direct editing control after generation

Once an image is generated, you can't tweak specific parts without regenerating the whole thing. This lack of editing control wastes time and credits as users must regenerate entire images for minor adjustments. Competitors like Leonardo.ai offer canvas editors for precise control.

Impact: 6/10Reported 6xNegativevia G2 (65 sources)workflow failure
Generic art outputs lack uniqueness

Despite improvements, Midjourney outputs can still be glitchy with generic art that lacks the uniqueness users seek. Multiple users report that 'evergreen prompts' are just fluke discoveries found through persistence and dumb luck, making consistent quality elusive.

Impact: 5/10Reported 5xNegativevia Reddit (45 sources)workflow failure
Performance2 signals
Bad anatomy in hands, teeth, and complex poses

Midjourney V7 still struggles with anatomical details, particularly hands, teeth, and background faces in crowded scenes. Users waste time regenerating images due to glitchy outputs. Even with V7's 30-40% improvement in bad generations, anatomy errors remain a consistent complaint.

Impact: 7/10Reported 8xNegativevia G2 (110 sources)workflow failure
GPU queue times reach 40+ minutes on busy days

Users get approximately 500-700 decent V7 images per month before hitting slow queues. Wait times can stretch to 5-40+ minutes during peak usage. Basic plan users especially feel the crunch with only 3.3 hours of fast GPU time monthly, which generates roughly 200 images.

Impact: 6/10Reported 6xNegativevia Reddit (85 sources)scaling breaks
Reliability1 signal
V7 quality worse than V6.1 for some use cases

Some users report that Midjourney V7 is somehow worse than V6.1 for their use cases. Fine artists and designers find the new version frustrating, with one user stating they're 'relieved that V7 is terrible' because it gives them an excuse to stop using the platform entirely.

Impact: 5/10Reported 4xNegativevia Other (30 sources)workflow failure
Security1 signal
Copyright lawsuits create uncertainty for commercial use

Ethical issues related to ongoing copyright lawsuits create uncertainty for businesses using Midjourney commercially. The training data controversy and legal battles make some enterprise users hesitant to rely on the platform for commercial projects.

Impact: 5/10Reported 4xNegativevia Reddit (35 sources)expectation mismatch

What Users Love

Best-in-class artistic and aesthetic quality

Midjourney remains the gold standard for artistic AI image generation in 2026, with unmatched painterly aesthetics and outputs that resemble professional concept art or high-end illustrations. V7's architecture rebuild delivered 30-40% fewer bad generations.

PerformanceMentioned 9x200 sources

Strong community and inspiration ecosystem

The Discord community provides an interactive element where users see others creating cool things and can adapt prompts. The 19.5M+ member community offers inspiration, shared techniques, and real-time learning from other creators.

UsabilityMentioned 8x150 sources

Excellent for concept art and illustration

For artistic and illustrative work, Midjourney produces stunning results that consistently outperform competitors. The aesthetic quality is particularly suited for concept art, fantasy art, and creative exploration.

PerformanceMentioned 8x180 sources

New web and mobile apps improve accessibility

In 2025, Midjourney launched dedicated web apps at midjourney.com and mobile apps for iOS and Android, finally moving beyond Discord-only. This makes the platform more accessible for professional workflows.

UsabilityMentioned 7x100 sources

Relatively simple to get started

Despite the Discord interface complaints, the basic prompt-to-image workflow is straightforward. Users can start generating images quickly without extensive technical knowledge or local hardware setup.

OnboardingMentioned 7x90 sources

Continuous model improvements

Midjourney consistently releases updates improving image quality. V7's complete architecture rebuild shows ongoing investment in the technology, even if some users prefer previous versions for specific use cases.

PerformanceMentioned 6x85 sources

Pricing Plans

Basic
$10/mo

Users: 1 user

Limitations: Limited to ~200 images, Long queue times when fast hours depleted, No privacy for prompts

No Stealth Mode (prompts visible publicly), No Relax Mode (must wait when out of fast hours), Annual billing required for 20% discount
Standard
Popular
$30/mo

Users: 1 user

Limitations: No privacy for prompts, Slow queues in Relax Mode, Not suitable for large businesses

No Stealth Mode, Companies over $1M revenue must upgrade to Pro, Relax Mode has 5-40 minute waits
Pro
$60/mo

Users: 1 user

Limitations: Required for companies over $1M revenue, Still no direct editing tools

Only plan with privacy, $576/year if billed annually, Still subject to content filters
Mega
$120/mo

Users: 1 user

Limitations: Expensive for individual creators, No team features, Still limited control over outputs

$1,152/year if billed annually, Same limitations as Pro just with more hours

Features

Core

  • Text-to-image generation
  • Image-to-image variation

    Upscale and vary existing images

  • Unlimited generations

    Standard+ with Relax Mode (slow)

Usability

  • Web interface

    Launched in 2025, still limited

  • Consistent characters

    Drifts after 3-4 images

  • Direct editing tools

    Must regenerate entire image

Mobile

  • Mobile apps

    iOS and Android launched 2025

Integrations

  • API access

    No official API available

Security

  • Private/Stealth mode

    Pro and Mega plans only ($60+/mo)

Performance

  • Text rendering

    Poor quality, DALL-E is better

Who Should Use This?

Good Fit

Concept artists and illustrators

Midjourney's artistic quality and painterly aesthetics are unmatched for concept art and illustration work. The style output naturally fits creative exploration and visual development phases.

Marketing teams needing quick visuals

For social media graphics, blog images, and marketing visuals that don't require precise specifications, Midjourney's artistic quality delivers eye-catching results quickly.

Neutral

Enterprise teams needing private workflow

Stealth Mode provides privacy but requires $60+/month Pro plan. The Discord-based workflow feels unprofessional for enterprise settings, though new web apps improve this somewhat.

Product designers needing precise outputs

Prompt interpretation is creative rather than literal, which frustrates users needing precise results. Good for exploration phases but requires many regenerations for specific outcomes.

Avoid

Comic book artists needing character consistency

Character consistency drifts after 3-4 shots, making it frustrating for actual comic production. Fine for initial concept work but fails at maintaining consistent characters across panels.

Graphic designers needing text in images

Text rendering is still terrible compared to DALL-E 3. If your work requires logos, signage, product labels, or any typography, Midjourney will waste your time with unusable text outputs.

Budget-conscious hobbyists

No free tier exists and Basic plan ($10/mo) only provides ~200 images. Free alternatives like Leonardo.ai offer generous free tiers. The no-refund policy makes experimenting risky.

Developers building AI image applications

No proper API for programmatic access. The Discord interface makes automation difficult. Developers should look at Stable Diffusion or dedicated API providers like WaveSpeedAI.

Regret Patterns

Common buyer's remorse scenarios reported by users.

Banned without explanation after paying

Users pay for subscription, use the service as intended, then get banned without warning or clear explanation. Appeals go unanswered and no refund is provided, leaving users feeling scammed.

Any time during subscription
Reported 7x
Realized free alternatives work well enough

After paying for several months, users discover Leonardo.ai or other free alternatives that meet their needs. The $120-360+ spent annually feels wasted when free options with generous limits exist.

After 2-3 months
Reported 6x
Discord workflow too unprofessional for client work

Professionals sign up for client projects but find the Discord interface embarrassing to use during client meetings. Screen sharing your work process shows a gaming chat platform, not professional software.

After first client project
Reported 5x
Basic plan images run out too quickly

New users sign up for Basic ($10/mo) expecting unlimited creativity, but ~200 images per month depletes quickly during exploration. Forced to wait in slow queues or upgrade, feeling bait-and-switched.

Within first week
Reported 6x
Couldn't get consistent characters for comic/story

Artists sign up planning to create consistent character narratives but discover the AI drifts after 3-4 images. The tool that seemed perfect for comics becomes useless for actual comic production.

After first project attempt
Reported 5x
Privacy concerns after seeing prompts public

Users realize their prompts and images are visible to millions of Discord users. Concepts for client work, personal projects, or sensitive creative exploration are exposed. Upgrading to Pro for Stealth Mode feels like extortion.

After first Discord session
Reported 5x

When It Breaks Down

Scenarios where this product tends to fail users.

Company revenue exceeds $1M
pricing

Once your company crosses $1M gross revenue, Midjourney requires upgrading to Pro ($60/mo) or Mega ($120/mo) plans. Standard plan usage becomes non-compliant, forcing unexpected cost increases.

Need to produce 500+ images monthly
performance

Heavy users hit GPU limits quickly. Basic plan's 200 images and Standard's 15 fast hours deplete, forcing 5-40 minute waits in Relax Mode. Production workflows become unpredictable.

Client requires text/typography in deliverables
usability

Projects requiring logos, signage, or readable text reveal Midjourney's weakness. Teams waste hours regenerating unusable text outputs before switching to DALL-E 3 or Ideogram mid-project.

Need programmatic/API access for product
integrations

Developers building products that need AI image generation hit a wall - Midjourney has no proper API. The Discord-based system prevents automation, forcing migration to Stable Diffusion or API-first alternatives.

Workflow requires consistent character reproduction
usability

Sequential storytelling, comic creation, or brand character work fails when Midjourney drifts character appearance after 3-4 generations. No control mechanisms exist to maintain consistency across images.

Enterprise needs audit trail and support SLAs
support

Corporate compliance and procurement processes require proper support channels, SLAs, and documentation. Midjourney's Discord-only support with no ticketing system fails enterprise requirements.

Alternatives Users Switch To

DALL-E

9x mentioned

Users switch for better text rendering and prompt adherence. Gain: superior typography, precise scene composition, integration with ChatGPT. Trade-off: less artistic/painterly style, requires ChatGPT Plus subscription.

Leonardo.ai

8x mentioned

Creators switch for flexibility and free tier. Gain: generous free plan, multiple AI models, canvas editor for precise control, no Discord required. Trade-off: slightly lower artistic quality than Midjourney's best outputs.

Stable Diffusion

8x mentioned

Power users switch for full control and no subscription. Gain: open source, run locally for free, unlimited customization via LoRA/ControlNet. Trade-off: requires technical setup, learning curve, local GPU hardware.

Adobe Firefly

7x mentioned

Creative teams switch for workflow integration. Gain: direct integration with Photoshop/Illustrator, commercially-safe training data, fits existing Adobe workflows. Trade-off: less creative/artistic than Midjourney, requires Creative Cloud subscription.

Ideogram

6x mentioned

Designers switch for reliable text rendering. Gain: best-in-class text in images, ideal for logos/posters/signage, good free tier. Trade-off: less artistic flexibility, narrower style range than Midjourney.

Frequently Asked Questions

See how Midjourney compares in our Best AI Image Software rankings, or calculate costs with our Budget Calculator.

Work at Midjourney or spotted something outdated? Suggest a correction — we verify every change against public sources. See our methodology.