Miro Problems & Issues

Real user-reported problems, complaints, and limitations for Miro. Based on analysis of 14 signals.

Issues by Category

pricing4 issues

Automatic billing for anyone who views a board

Users report being automatically charged $20/person/month for anyone who merely viewed a board, without explicit consent. The billing system adds users without confirmation, leading to unexpected charges. One of the most complained-about issues on Trustpilot.

Frequency: 9%Sentiment: -0.85/10045 sources
Impact
9

Free plan limits only 3 editable boards

On the Free plan, only 3 most recently created boards are editable - the rest become view-only. Users unexpectedly lose editing access to their own boards. This limitation isn't clearly communicated upfront.

Frequency: 8%Sentiment: -0.65/10030 sources
Impact
7

Expensive for teams - $16/user/month for Business

Business plan costs $16/user/month, making it expensive for larger teams. A 20-person team pays $3,840/year minimum. Competitors like FigJam start at $5/user/month. Many features locked behind expensive tiers.

Frequency: 7%Sentiment: -0.6/10035 sources
Impact
7

No straightforward way to cancel subscription

Users report difficulty canceling subscriptions. The process isn't straightforward, and some report being charged after attempting to cancel. Billing support communication is slow with no phone support option.

Frequency: 5%Sentiment: -0.65/10018 sources
Impact
7
usability4 issues

Sharing boards accidentally adds people to billing

Sharing a board is described as 'nearly impossible' without accidentally inviting strangers into the Team and triggering automatic billing. The permission system is confusing and defaults to billable seats.

Frequency: 6%Sentiment: -0.7/10022 sources
Impact
8

Steep learning curve and overwhelming interface

The open-ended canvas and wide range of tools overwhelm beginners. UI features can be confusing at first due to many options. New users struggle to get productive without dedicated training time.

Frequency: 7%Sentiment: -0.55/10035 sources
Impact
6

Navigation is unintuitive with confusing menus

Users find navigation unintuitive with confusing menus and awkward selection tools. Switching between pointer and hand tool is slow. Zooming and navigating large boards creates friction. The canvas doesn't let you write wherever you want.

Frequency: 6%Sentiment: -0.55/10030 sources
Impact
6

Limited text and sticky note formatting options

The formatting of sticky notes and text boxes is limited - you can't format text like you would in Word. Limited data visualization options. Users find multiple sticky notes confusing and easy to miss.

Frequency: 5%Sentiment: -0.45/10020 sources
Impact
5
performance2 issues

Large boards become extremely laggy and slow

Performance degrades significantly on large boards with many objects. Users report lag, freezing, and long loading times. The desktop app and web app both suffer from these issues. Boards with extensive content become nearly unusable.

Frequency: 8%Sentiment: -0.7/10040 sources
Impact
8

Uses excessive RAM, long launching times

Miro uses a lot of RAM to run smoothly. When there's too much data, launching time becomes very long. The application struggles on lower-spec machines, especially with complex boards.

Frequency: 5%Sentiment: -0.55/10018 sources
Impact
6
reliability2 issues

Updates don't save - work gets lost

The interface glitches and at times updates do not save. Users report losing hours of work when boards fail to sync properly. Data loss is particularly frustrating for collaborative work where multiple people contribute.

Frequency: 6%Sentiment: -0.8/10020 sources
Impact
9

Boards fail to load and disconnect frequently

Users report Miro disconnecting every 5 seconds, boards failing to load (endless loading), and boards turning grey requiring app restarts. These issues turn 10-minute tasks into 30+ minute ordeals.

Frequency: 7%Sentiment: -0.7/10025 sources
Impact
8
support1 issue

AI chatbot useless, no real support response

Customer support is limited to an AI chatbot that users describe as 'completely useless'. Formal written complaints receive no response. Users report losing entire boards with hours of work and getting only FAQ articles instead of help.

Frequency: 7%Sentiment: -0.75/10028 sources
Impact
8
security1 issue

Complex permission management for teams

Ongoing complex permission management for larger teams. Board-level permissions are confusing. It's hard to control who can edit vs view, leading to accidental edits or accidental billing.

Frequency: 4%Sentiment: -0.5/10015 sources
Impact
5

Regret Patterns

Common reasons users regret choosing Miro.

Unexpected charges for guest viewers

Users share boards with clients or external collaborators, only to discover they've been automatically charged $20/person/month. The billing system adds viewers as billable seats without clear warning, leading to hundreds in unexpected charges.

Frequency: 8%After first invoice

Free plan boards became view-only

Users create multiple boards on the free plan, then discover older boards become view-only after having 3 active. Important work becomes inaccessible for editing, forcing an upgrade or starting over.

Frequency: 7%Within first month

Paid for Miro but FigJam was cheaper

Teams commit to Miro's annual billing, then discover FigJam offers similar features at $5/user vs $8-16/user. Design teams especially regret not evaluating FigJam's Figma integration first.

Frequency: 6%After annual commitment

Large board became unusable due to lag

Teams invest significant time building comprehensive boards, then find performance degrades to unusable levels. The board that was supposed to be the single source of truth becomes too slow to use productively.

Frequency: 6%After extensive use

Lost hours of work due to sync failure

Users spend hours on collaborative sessions, only to discover changes didn't save. The board glitched, disconnected, or failed to sync. Support provides only FAQ articles instead of data recovery help.

Frequency: 5%During critical work

Team overwhelmed by complexity

Managers adopt Miro expecting easy collaboration, but team members struggle with the steep learning curve. Adoption stalls as people avoid using the tool, making the investment wasteful.

Frequency: 5%During onboarding

Couldn't cancel subscription properly

Users attempt to cancel before renewal but continue to be charged. The cancellation process is confusing, and support is unresponsive. Some report charges months after thinking they cancelled.

Frequency: 5%At renewal

When Miro Breaks Down

Specific scenarios where Miro fails or underperforms.

Need more than 3 active boards

The free plan limits you to 3 editable boards. When you exceed this, older boards become view-only. You're forced to either delete work, constantly shuffle boards, or upgrade to paid.

Board grows too large and complex

As your board accumulates content, performance degrades. Lag increases, loading takes longer, RAM usage spikes. Eventually, the board becomes too slow for productive work.

Sharing boards with external collaborators

Inviting clients or external partners risks automatic billing charges. Permission settings are confusing. You may accidentally add billable seats when you intended guest view-only access.

Need urgent support for a problem

Something breaks before an important workshop or presentation. The AI chatbot can't help, formal support is slow or unresponsive, and there's no phone support for most plans.

Team members resist adoption

The learning curve is too steep for casual users. Team members avoid using Miro, preferring simpler tools. Your investment doesn't pay off because adoption never reaches critical mass.

Internet connection becomes unreliable

Miro requires constant internet. Disconnections cause work to not save, boards to go grey, and frustrating reload cycles. No offline mode means you're stuck if connectivity is poor.

Trying to cancel subscription

The cancellation process isn't straightforward. Users report continued charges after cancellation attempts. Support is slow to respond. You may need to dispute charges with your bank.

Enterprise security audit reveals permission issues

Complex permission management leads to accidental data exposure. Security reviews find boards shared with unintended users. Cleaning up permissions across many boards is tedious.