JetBrains Rider Problems & Issues
AppFast & Powerful Cross-Platform .NET IDE
Excellent cross-platform .NET IDE with ReSharper built-in, but significant memory issues and expensive compared to free Visual Studio
Overview
Rider is a cross-platform .NET IDE by JetBrains for C#, ASP.NET, .NET Core, Xamarin, and Unity development. It combines ReSharper and IntelliJ IDEA features for powerful code analysis, refactoring, and debugging across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Signals & Issues
Patterns extracted from real user feedback — not raw reviews.
Users report Rider using over 6GB of memory on larger projects. The IDE consumes around 4.5GB even with no project open. Some users have to quit Rider multiple times daily to prevent it from using all system memory and freezing everything.
The UI constantly freezes every few seconds during typing or clicking. Everything feels sluggish. Large solutions hang at 'syncing' or 'catching up' with insufficient memory errors. Users report needing to hard reboot if not caught in time.
Rider is slower to start up than Visual Studio Code or even Visual Studio. It takes a while to index big projects before full functionality is available. This affects developers who frequently open/close projects.
Rider costs $169/year for individuals vs Visual Studio Community being free. While Rider recently added a free non-commercial tier, professional developers still face significant costs that add up annually compared to free alternatives.
After updating to version 2025.3, the IDE became barely usable, freezing machines and running at full load. Solutions with many projects hang during syncing. While patched in 2025.3.0.4, it shows quality risks of major updates.
Rarely Rider loses IntelliSense and the only way to get it back is by restarting the IDE. This disrupts workflow and requires closing and reopening the IDE.
The debugger tools are still lacking compared to Visual Studio, especially when considering plugins such as OzCode. Advanced debugging scenarios may require falling back to Visual Studio.
Rider does not support opening multiple solutions with sub-projects simultaneously. This limitation frustrates developers working across multiple related codebases.
It is much harder to assign custom keybinds compared to other IDEs. Developers coming from Visual Studio or VS Code find the keyboard shortcut configuration less intuitive.
The file search feature does not auto-clear previous search terms, requiring manual clearing. This small annoyance adds friction to the search workflow.
Some special features like general deployment or code generation for services are not as mature as in Visual Studio yet. Enterprise-specific workflows may require Visual Studio.
As far as plugins are concerned, Visual Studio is the clear winner with a wider variety primarily because it has been in use for over two decades. Some specialized tools only exist for Visual Studio.
What Users Love
Faster than Visual Studio for large solutions
Rider is renowned for being lightweight and offers improved performance and quicker startup compared to bloated Visual Studio installations. Many developers find it more responsive for day-to-day coding.
True cross-platform support
Rider runs perfectly on Windows, macOS, and Linux with full feature parity. This is a major advantage over Visual Studio which is primarily Windows-focused with a less capable macOS version.
Built-in ReSharper functionality
Rider includes all ReSharper features natively without the performance overhead of running ReSharper as a Visual Studio plugin. Code analysis, refactoring, and navigation are integrated seamlessly.
Excellent Unity integration
Rider has deep Unity integration with specialized debugging, Unity-specific code analysis, and performance profiling. Many Unity developers prefer it over Visual Studio for game development.
Superior refactoring capabilities
Code refactoring inherited from ReSharper is comprehensive and reliable. Renaming, extracting methods, and restructuring code works across large .NET solutions safely.
Free for non-commercial use
JetBrains recently made Rider freely available for non-commercial use, making it accessible for hobbyists, open source contributors, and learners without subscription cost.
Pricing Plans
Users: 1 user
Limitations: Non-commercial use only, no enterprise features
Users: 1 user
Limitations: No volume discounts, no perpetual fallback
Users: 1 user
Limitations: More expensive than other JetBrains IDEs, must wait for loyalty discounts
Users: Per user
Limitations: Significantly more expensive than Visual Studio licenses
Users: 1 user
Limitations: More cost-effective if using multiple JetBrains products
Features
Languages
- C# code completion
Best-in-class via ReSharper
Frameworks
- .NET Core support
Full support
- ASP.NET support
Full support
- Unity integration
Deep integration
- Xamarin support
Built-in
Tools
- Cross-platform
Windows, macOS, Linux
- Database tools
Built-in
- Debugging
Good but lacks OzCode equivalent
Version Control
- Git integration
Comprehensive
Editor
- Code refactoring
ReSharper built-in
Pricing
- Free tier
Non-commercial only
AI
- AI Assistant
Paid addon required
Who Should Use This?
Good Fit
.NET developers on macOS/Linux
Rider is the only full-featured .NET IDE that runs natively on macOS and Linux. For cross-platform developers, it's essential as Visual Studio for Mac was discontinued.
Unity game developers
Rider has deep Unity integration with specialized debugging, Unity-specific code analysis, and performance profiling. Many Unity developers consider it superior to Visual Studio for game development.
ReSharper users frustrated with VS performance
Rider includes all ReSharper functionality natively without the performance overhead of running ReSharper as a Visual Studio plugin. It's faster and more responsive.
Hobbyists and open source contributors
The free non-commercial tier makes Rider accessible without subscription cost. Full features for hobbyist projects, learning, and open source work.
Neutral
Enterprise .NET developers on Windows
Visual Studio has deeper enterprise integration, more plugins, and established workflows. Rider is catching up but some deployment and code generation features are less mature.
Teams requiring advanced debugging tools
Rider's debugger is good but lacks equivalent to Visual Studio plugins like OzCode. Teams with advanced debugging requirements may still need Visual Studio.
Budget-conscious commercial developers
At $169/year (vs free Visual Studio Community), Rider is expensive. However, the productivity gains from ReSharper-quality tooling may justify the cost for professional work.
Avoid
Developers on machines with limited RAM
Rider uses over 4.5GB RAM even with no project open and can exceed 6GB on larger projects. Users report needing to restart multiple times daily to manage memory.
Regret Patterns
Common buyer's remorse scenarios reported by users.
Users have to quit Rider multiple times daily to prevent it from using all system memory and freezing everything. If not caught in time, hard reboots are required. This destroys productivity.
Developers who updated to 2025.3 experienced barely usable IDE with constant freezing. While eventually patched, it demonstrates risks of major version updates disrupting workflow.
Windows-only developers realize Visual Studio Community is free with more plugins and enterprise features. The $169/year Rider subscription feels unnecessary when not using cross-platform features.
Developers hitting advanced debugging needs discover Rider lacks equivalents to Visual Studio plugins like OzCode. Must fall back to Visual Studio for complex debugging.
Individual Rider users find their team standardizing on Visual Studio for consistency and enterprise integration. The Rider subscription becomes redundant.
Developers who purchased Rider for hobby projects discover JetBrains later released a free non-commercial tier. The subscription purchase feels unnecessary for non-work projects.
When It Breaks Down
Scenarios where this product tends to fail users.
Rider uses 4.5GB+ RAM even with no project open and can exceed 6GB on larger solutions. On systems with 8GB, constant memory pressure causes freezing and requires frequent restarts.
Large solutions with many projects hang at 'syncing' or 'catching up' stages. Insufficient memory errors appear. Indexing takes excessive time before features work properly.
Rider's debugger is good but lacks equivalents to Visual Studio plugins like OzCode. Teams with advanced debugging requirements must maintain Visual Studio alongside or instead of Rider.
Some enterprise features like deployment automation and code generation for services are less mature than Visual Studio. Organizations with specific deployment needs may require Visual Studio.
Visual Studio has deeper enterprise integration and more plugins developed over two decades. Teams entrenched in Microsoft ecosystem may find Rider's benefits insufficient to justify switching.
Version updates like 2025.3 can cause severe performance regressions making the IDE barely usable until patched. Early adopters risk workflow disruption after updates.
Alternatives Users Switch To
Visual Studio
9x mentionedWindows-focused developers switch for free Community edition and deeper enterprise integration. Gain: free for small teams, more plugins, established enterprise workflows, OzCode support. Trade-off: Windows-only full experience, bloated, slower than Rider.
VS Code
7x mentionedDevelopers wanting lightweight editor switch for speed and flexibility. Gain: free, fastest startup, cross-platform, massive extension ecosystem. Trade-off: requires C# extension setup, less integrated debugging, no built-in ReSharper equivalent.
Visual Studio for Mac
4x mentionedMac developers historically used this but Microsoft discontinued it. Gain: was free. Trade-off: discontinued, Rider is now the primary macOS option for .NET development.
JetBrains IntelliJ
3x mentionedPolyglot developers working with JVM languages alongside .NET switch for broader language support. Gain: Java, Kotlin, Scala plus C# plugin. Trade-off: C# support via plugin not as deep as Rider.
Vim
2x mentionedKeyboard-focused developers switch for speed and minimal resources. Gain: instant startup, minimal RAM, terminal workflow, free. Trade-off: steep learning curve, requires significant configuration for C# tooling.
Frequently Asked Questions
See how JetBrains Rider compares in our Best Jetbrains IDE Software rankings, or calculate costs with our Budget Calculator.
Work at JetBrains Rider or spotted something outdated? Suggest a correction — we verify every change against public sources. See our methodology.