Teams switch to Figma for all-in-one design and handoff in a single platform. Gain: real-time collaboration, built-in Dev Mode, no separate handoff tool needed, significant cost savings. Trade-off: Dev Mode doesn't freeze designs like Zeplin, so specs can change during development.

Teams already using Figma switch to native Dev Mode to consolidate tools. Gain: no separate subscription, everything in one place, real-time updates. Trade-off: designs aren't frozen for handoff, developers may see work-in-progress changes.

Teams switch to InVision for better prototyping and broader design capabilities. Gain: interactive prototypes, user testing features, more comprehensive design workflow. Trade-off: InVision Inspect is best for smaller projects, less robust for enterprise handoff.

Teams switch to Avocode for better organization and wider design tool support. Gain: cleaner UI with better search, supports Photoshop/AI/XD/Figma/Sketch, easier navigation. Trade-off: no free plan available, pricing may be higher.

Sketch-heavy teams switch to Abstract for design version control. Gain: Git-like versioning for design files, better collaboration history, branching workflows. Trade-off: primarily Sketch-focused, less useful for Figma teams.

Budget-conscious Sketch teams switch to free Sketch Measure plugin. Gain: completely free, generates spec sheets directly from Sketch. Trade-off: no cloud collaboration, manual export process, less polished than Zeplin.